Omega Indexer was one of the indexing tools we've tested before that was generating good results. However, it got very popular and Google killed it. The program figured out a workaround and got their tool indexing again, yet, Google adapted again.
But now, the Omega team claims that they have come up with another indexing method that all but guarantees to get your URLs indexed at just about a 100% rate within 7 days.
Clint tests out this claim.
Test Downloads:
Transcription below:
Hey everyone, Clint Butler here. We have another test for you, this is test number 665 - Is The Omega Indexer Working Again?
So if you don't know what the Omega Indexer is, I’m kind of a fanboy. It was built by the guys over at SEO Autopilot. Originally, they created a thing called Colinkri that did crawling and the problem with crawling is just because Google crawls your website, doesn't necessarily mean it's going to index a website. And people were buying that thing thinking, if Google crawls, I'm going to index - that's not true. I told you over and over again and all the sales material and stuff, this is a crawler, triggers crawls not indexing, and people just bought it and still complain.
So they made an indexer. Omega indexer was one of the first to get like above 90% indexing when they first started out and it was actually really, really good and that lasted probably like two or three weeks and Google figured out what they were doing and kind of shut them down. So they ran into that problem.
I was doing some tests for SIA and I found another indexing metho and that was using the Google Indexing API and the combination of broadcast schema or job posting schema. Job posting schema was actually easier but you could use broadcast or job post at the time.
And so they figured out how to leverage that test where the indexing API was not indexing any page that didn't have that schema on it, they figured it out and Google turned that filter on.
Well, that method that they figured out and scaled stopped working again and it's been a couple of months, I'd say like for at least for this thing, it did not have a really good success rate. I mean, they were down in the 60 percent, 30 to 60% on average for some people, which is to be honest, is typical of what everyone else was getting.
But these guys aren't necessarily happy with that so they created another method or they've learned another method and they were able to scale it again and released a new version. This version is literally, I think is a week or two old and what's good about it is now they're actually going to limit the amount of users so not anyone can just jump over there and sign up for it. Which keeps the effectiveness down, especially if people don't necessarily submit all of their junk links. I mean, all of our links are beautiful, right?
The fact of the matter is, if you're sending a whole bunch of junk links, like a GSA or even maybe an SEO autopilot link, it's not really well thought out, you can burn an indexing method out because Google will get used to finding those bad links that they wouldn't consider otherwise, and just handle it that way, and then shut down the indexing method, or even be less responsive to that method.
So they're going to limit the amount of users so this is kind of a timely thing. If they've sold out, get on their list, I think they have quite a few people left that they can let in. I mean it's not like they're only going to let in 20. I think it's like 500 is what they're eliminating at. So you got plenty of time, just don't say you weren't warned if that doesn't work.
So how did I test this? What I did, it's all in the write-up right here, but I had a domain and we were building essentially some location-based pages for map embeds and for NAP to create citations. We had a domain and we were using that and I was testing another indexing method. I'll probably write that one up just to say - hey, this one doesn't work but don't let the cat out of the bag now.
We created these pages, it was 155 of them. Then we created essentially a location page and on that location page, we put the QR code for every one of those other pages on it. So you have this one location page with 155 QR codes on it to all the other pages that were on the website and that failed. None of those are indexed at all. And so I had those, they're ready to go, they're all no index. We know they're no index, we've been testing them, checking them for like, a month and never indexed.
I dropped those into Omega and what happened was I dropped them in on a Thursday, Elias checked them on a Monday and said - we were pretty much all indexed but we still had some go and the service guarantees a really high indexing rate within, I think it's seven days is the number they gave. But I was able to get a killer indexing rate in five. When I say killer, in five days, we are at 100% index. These aren't trash pages by any means but they're not like high-quality content if that's what everyone is looking for. They're just relatively decent pages with some generic content on map embed and some interlinking and a pretty large footer to interlink all the pages. That's really what they are.
So it's not like your money site content stuff and to get 100% indexing rate on those on a brand new domain, that's pretty damn good. So I think you will appreciate Omega Indexer. Again, it's been tested now, 100% indexing rate, if you go over there, putting your money sites stuff in there and your tier one backlinks, I would say expect a 92% indexing rate and that will be pretty good. You may have to submit one or two again over again. Still, that's really really good indexing, right? And if you combine this with other services like Speed Indexer’s VIP, etc., then you should be sitting in a really good position after that.
So check this out, check out the service, and let us know how you get along, and I hope that you enjoyed test number 665. Plain, simple, and easy. See you on the next one!